Neanderthal Project

John Locke had it wrong.

December 31st, 2011

In America, we, more than any other first-world country, are stuck in a Lockean world where it is taken as gospel that man is, to quote Locke, the property acquiring animal. A great majority of our laws an social structure are built atop this axiom. However, I believe that the evidence is overwhelming that rather than being the “property acquiring” animal, humankind is the “media producing” animal, and that acquiring property is in fact always in service to the production of new media, new technology, new ideas, and new ways of thinking. If there is any value in possessing property, it is in its potential to be utilized as base material for a new thing, which is given back to us as a species.

http://www.neanderthalproject.com/?p=35

  • Twitter
  • del.icio.us
  • Digg
  • Facebook
  • Technorati
  • Reddit
  • Yahoo Buzz
  • StumbleUpon

Cro-Magnon is the hybrid offspring of Neanderthals and Homo Sapiens

June 6th, 2011

It’s late, and I’m tired. I have some things to say, but I don’t have the energy to organize them and provide supporting data at the moment. I’ll break the whole mess into smaller, easy-to-digest nuggets later, and will even provide APA- or MLA-formatted references so that you may comfort yourself by dint of the “authority” of such references, and feel safe to use the nuggets at parties to wow your friends with your edgy, unconventional ideas. Yeah, I’m in a mood.

So let’s just get right to it, shall we? Cro-Magnon may have interbred with Neanderthals, but it is more important to recognize that Cro-Magnon (and it isn’t Cro-Magnon anymore. It’s Early Modern Human, but everyone knows the term Cro-Magnon) IS the hybrid offspring of Homo Sapiens and Neanderthals, and they may have originated either in the Levant or in Central Asia, where the two species’ ranges overlapped during the last interglacial period. This hasn’t been asserted in many places, if any at all, as far as I know. What do I know? I know that the facts make this an inevitable explanation, and each moment that passes between my assertion and the publishing of an “authoritative” theory which agrees is sweeter than the one before it.

If you want to know what a modern human looks like who doesn’t have any Neanderthal DNA, then look at the Sub-Saharan Africans. Everyone else is carrying between 1% and 5% Neanderthal DNA. This is a fact, and you’ll just have to find a way to deal with it. In fact, Europeans appear to be more closely related to Neanderthals in some portions of their genome than they are to modern Sub-Saharan Africans! In my communications with others on this topic, I keep encountering “authoritative” statements that “there probably wasn’t much genetic material exchanged… insignificant, really.”  Don’t believe it, folks. We have also learned that genes which are correlated with Downs’ Syndrome, Autism, schizophrenia, and some metabolic disorders are among the package of genes we’ve inherited from Neanderthals. Now, you’ll have to pardon me for asking how it is that we hybrids have won the planet in terms of sexual fertility over our pure Homo Sapiens cousins in Africa and our extinct Neanderthal cousins, despite the fact that this very heritage comes with debilitating diseases of the mind and body?

Nevermind, I have the answer. It turns out that there has been an effort – unconnected to the Neanderthal inquiry – by modern forensic psychologists to offer mental health diagnoses on historical figures using what ever data is available. Guess what? It turns out that the likes of Sir Isaac Newton, Mozart, and Einstein all appear to have likely been on the Autism spectrum of disorders. What I am telling you, dear reader, is that genius is the product of having a hybrid cognitive architecture. It isn’t because Neanderthal was a super genius. No way. He may have had a great memory and an innately superior “visual sketch pad”, but subtle humor would be lost on him, as well as wordplay and any complex cognitive task requiring lots of working memory. And Homo Sapiens? Well, just look at Sub-Saharan Africa and you tell me. (And, as an aside, isn’t this why this research is scaring away the progressives and the liberals? Isn’t this why we aren’t really exploring this topic in a more open and mainstream way? I think it is, but that will have to wait for another post.)

The point is that it was the fusion of two different kinds of minds which forced genius upon us. Walk with me on this, and I promise you will get it in just a moment. When we were either pure Neanderthal or pure Homo Sapiens, our social organization was based upon similar evolutionary pressures and steady adaptation, and we relied heavily on non-conscious cues. When we were mixed, not only did we inherit the cognitive features of two different species, but also conflicting social cues. The explosion of material culture and the new suite of behaviors constituting the “Human Revolution” of the Upper Paleolithic was due to the fact that we, as hybrid humans, found it necessary to create external signs and signals to compensate for the loss of social and cognitive functions which had been hitherto undisclosed to consciousness. For example, a scepter or “magic stick” might have been an external symbol denoting leadership among a group who could no longer rely on smell or other non-visible cues. Adornment and symbols of status and role were only made necessary by virtue of the fact that the non-conscious social cues failed us – resulting in a “Tower of Babel” effect which needed a fix.

One must consider that it took quite some time before any viable hybrid offspring would emerge who could enjoy reproductive success among Homo Sapiens, and thus the archeological record indicates that the earliest Cro-Magnons emerged in Central Asia or the Levant, then pushed westward and northward to the Iberian peninsula, then into Northern Europe. They moved into Neanderthal country. Probably because there weren’t any Homo Sapiens there. I think that by the time the Cro-Magnons had developed the social mechanisms for inclusion of different cognitive styles, they had become quite aware that they were different and were very much aware of why they had not only survived but had begun to flourish. It was their inventiveness and their ability to communicate new skills and concepts to one another and upcoming generations of children. Again, it came with a price. Autism, schizophrenia, and the rest of it. We grew stronger in spite of the genetic drawbacks. Why? Because they forced us to adapt.

Now let’s stitch this together in blunt language. We hybrids dominate the planet, and have outpaced our pure cousins because changes in the D-allele makes our brain function more efficient somehow, and because the genetic mismatch resulting in Asperger’s and related “diseases” also tends to produce highly analytical minds whose processes are more decoupled from functions which relate to social integration. The stereotype of the high school nerd who grows up to become  the jock’s boss comes to mind. A brain which is not dedicated full-time to monkey concerns of status and shifting social alliances is freed up to invent a new kind of spear head, etc..

Okay, I’m out of gas. I’ll come back later and spank it some more…

 

  • Twitter
  • del.icio.us
  • Digg
  • Facebook
  • Technorati
  • Reddit
  • Yahoo Buzz
  • StumbleUpon

UFO Neanderthal Illuminati Disclosure

May 19th, 2011

For months, now, I’ve been scouring the web in search of frank conversation regarding the news of the fact of our hybrid ancestry. It isn’t necessarily hard to find discussion, but it is very hard to find intelligent discussion. In fact, the mainstream online media streams have been inundated by amateur videos made by armchair philosophers and fanatical Christian and/or white-supremacy groups. In addition to this swill, there are Afro-centric groups who have similarly mangled and twisted the implications of hybridization into bizarre and unique pseudo-ethnographic caricatures. And, of course, Neanderthals are somehow involved in the UFO-NWO-Illuminati-Rockefeller-Ninja- Space Opera. In all cases, the valid scientific information has been co-opted by those who have no intention to use it responsibly or to serve any legitimate purpose. They are an irritant to me, and I am compelled to cough up a little rant like some kind of fringe-culture oyster making a hate-pearl.

The majority of it is of little importance, belonging to the “lost in the moment” realm of human attention, where the meaning of words is equivalent to how much currency they can bring in the context of “ratings” within a marginal peer group. However, there are things to be said – shocking things – about hybrid heritage and what it means. There are things which will hurt other people when they are said; objective, reliable, and consistently verifiable ramifications which deserve our attention if for no other reason than because they are true. And by “true”, I mean factual, and not some kind of metaphysical sense of the word which is more comfortable because it doesn’t demand that you accept it. Facts are to be accepted, or else you must cash in your chips. If your currency isn’t facts and knowledge, then it can only be politics and coercion, because if you don’t have the truth on your side, then you must invest in denial, and if that fails, in silencing the truth with normative social pressures and, if that fails, threat and coercion.

I’ve never been diagnosed as being on the Autism spectrum, but then again, I’ve never been diagnosed by any kind of mental health practitioner for any reason. I know that I’m unconventional, care little for the company (or approval) of others, and take perverse enjoyment in splitting the hairs which grow on the membrane separating how the world really works versus the socially sanctioned and approved narratives. It’s a permeable membrane, but not permeable enough to relieve the growing pressure of knowledge versus the cherished narratives which sustained generations of humans through hardship and travails. Put simply, the marketplace of ideas within our culture is not adequate to the task of distributing self-knowledge and understanding about the world as quickly as that knowledge is being developed. In short, the surface area of ignorance is growing faster than the surface area of understanding because our culture has arranged itself in such a way that throttles knowledge by emphasizing escapism as a viable cognitive strategy. It’s a strategy so deeply embedded into our collective consciousness that we don’t even recognize it as such – or that we even have a choice. This is particularly true here in the United States. People like to say “An armed society is a polite society, ” but few really stop to question the premise. What does it mean? It means that you never have to explain your thinking as long as you’re armed. And that, my friends, is called a crutch. When you can’t answer for your thoughts, you simply change the subject to who is better armed. So, we have the “appeal to the stick” informal logical fallacy encoded into our national character, and this is only too obvious. In the preamble to the Constitution of the United States we find it explicitly stated that we are endowed by a creator with the right to life liberty, and the pursuit of happiness. Unfortunately, it looks like the pursuit of happiness doesn’t include the pursuit of knowledge or understanding about the human mind itself, and thus can never actually lead to a lasting happiness – only an ephemeral, immaterial dream of the product or status you don’t yet possess.

Maybe I’m just too hard on my fellow human beings, but you know I’ve seen well-educated and well-fed people who do not know want who still could not bring themselves to suffer the pains of awareness and cravenly sought refuge in ideology and fairy tales. “Just let me live my life and believe in unicorn-powered UFOs, the moral correctness of Free Market Capitalism, and Monday Night Football!” they plead pathetically. No. No. I require more than this from my fellow human beings. Think, you mongrels.

  • Twitter
  • del.icio.us
  • Digg
  • Facebook
  • Technorati
  • Reddit
  • Yahoo Buzz
  • StumbleUpon

Europeans Never Had Neanderthal Neighbors?

May 10th, 2011

Russian find suggests Neanderthals died out earlier than was thought.

from Nature News, Ewen Callaway

PASCAL GOETGHELUCK/SCIENCE PHOTO LIBRARY

Neanderthals and humans probably never coexisted in Europe.

The first humans to reach Europe may have found it a ghost world. Carbon-dated Neanderthal remains from the foothills of the Caucasus Mountains suggest that the archaic species had died out before modern humans arrived.

The remains are almost 10,000 years older than expected. They come from just one cave in western Russia, called Mezmaiskaya, but bones at other Neanderthal sites farther west could also turn out to be more ancient than previously thought, thanks to a precise carbon-dating technique, says Thomas Higham, a palaeoanthropologist at the University of Oxford, UK, and a co-author of a study published this week in the Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences1.

The implication, says Higham’s team, is that Neanderthals and humans might never have met in Europe. However, the Neanderthal genome, decoded last year2, hints that the ancestors of all humans, except those from Africa, interbred with Neanderthals somewhere. Perhaps humans departing Africa encountered resident Neanderthals in the Middle East.

“DNA results show that there was admixture probably at some stage in our human ancestry, but it more than likely happened quite a long time before humans arrived in Europe,” says Ron Pinhasi, an archaeologist at University College Cork in Ireland, who is lead author of the latest study. “I don’t believe there were regions where Neanderthals were living next to modern humans. I just don’t find it very feasible,” he adds.

Time horizon

Carbon dating of stone tools characteristic to humans and Neanderthals, as well as their physical remains, has previously given the impression that the first humans to reach Europe, between about 40,000 and 30,000 years ago, shared the continent with Neanderthals long established there.

However, carbon dating of bones older than about 30,000 years is skirting the limits of the technology, because by that age nearly all of the radioactive carbon has decayed, says Higham.

The overlap in dating could also be the result of contamination of older finds with younger material. “What we are finding is that the careful and patient excavation work of many archaeological sites has not been supported by accurate and reliable radiocarbon dating,” Higham adds.

Previous excavations had suggested that the most recent Neanderthals at Mezmaiskaya died around 33,000 years ago. But using the most up-to-date dating techniques, Pinhasi and his team dated the remains of two Neanderthal infants from the site to around 40,000 years ago. The infants’ bones were found above the cave’s other Neanderthal remains, so they must be the most recent, says Higham.

He is now re-dating other Neanderthal sites, and expects those dates to creep upwards, too. “My gut feeling would be that probably the latest Neanderthals and the earliest modern humans may have overlapped for a bit, but not for too much,” says Higham.

David Reich, a geneticist at Harvard Medical School in Boston, Massachusetts, says that Higham’s conclusion fits with his own team’s discovery that all contemporary humans, except those who trace their ancestry to Africa, owe about 1–4% of their DNA to interbreeding between humans and Neanderthals2. Reich’s team did not find any proof that Neanderthals ever mated with the ancestors of modern Europeans specifically.

Yet Reich says that new, more sensitive methods for detecting interbreeding, as well as genome sequences from late Neanderthals could change that conclusion. “Absence of evidence isn’t evidence of absence,” he says.

Chris Stringer, a palaeoanthropologist at the Natural History Museum in London, agrees that Neanderthals were rare in Europe after 40,000 years ago — but adds that they might not have completely disappeared. “It does seem that if Neanderthal populations existed after that time, they must have been small and scattered remnants,” he says.

Evidence for more recent Neanderthal populations does exist. Clive Finlayson, director of the Gibraltar Museum, and his team have dated a Neanderthal settlement in Gorham’s Cave in Gibraltar, overlooking the Mediterranean, to as recently as 24,000 years ago3.

“Eurasia is a big place and there doesn’t seem to be any reason why populations of Neanderthals may not have survived somewhere,” says Higham.

  • References

    1. Pinhasi, R. , Higham, T. F. G. , Golovanova, L. V. & Doronichev, V. B. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA doi:10.1073/pnas.1018938108 (2011).
    2. Green, R. E. et al. Science 328, 710-722 (2010).
    3. Finlayson, C. et al. Nature 443, 850-853 (2006).
  • Twitter
  • del.icio.us
  • Digg
  • Facebook
  • Technorati
  • Reddit
  • Yahoo Buzz
  • StumbleUpon